Wednesday, October 16, 2013

long PATH, LD_LIBRARY_PATH, … – what kind of performance impact do they have?

A long PATH… makes the OS …
  1. "… access the disk quite often, hence there is a lot of disk I/O" – do you agree?
  2. "… compute a lot of …, hence a high CPU load" – do you agree?
I got involved in a rather "controversial" discussion on that. I voted for (1). What are you voting for?

I posted this issue at as well.

No comments: